Monday, November 21, 2022

“I Can See, Sir, That You Have a Dazzling Intellect.” From Princess Bride

 

To adequately engage with Jordan Peterson’s Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief, [[1]far more time and even more space is necessary than is possible in this brief post.  Peterson is the popular Canadian Psychology Professor from Toronto, who uses philosophical reasoning to explain “how humans generate ‘meaning.’” [2] Peterson’s manner of communicating his theories in the 500 pages would dazzle the mind of the Philosophy of Ethics professor. I found Peterson to be a man on a quest to find the multitude of questions that haunt him and could help others resolve their own unanswered questions about life. This search included:

  •          Reasonable answers about God, or myth as he refers to it.
  •          Explanation of profound evil of humans toward one another
  •        Economic and other social injustices [3]
  •        The acquisition of meaning
  •        The role of culture, community, in the development of meaning how individuals respond to various situations.
  •        How individuals come to share the same moral set of rules.
  •        The emergence of a hero type.
  •        Finally, is his discussion of Jesus

Peterson’s explanation of the mythological was interesting but I found it to be void of an aspect of grace. That being said he did challenge my thinking in regard to culture, family, home, and how that translating into the church community.

Culture is worked into the very fiber of our identity within our families, the practices, rituals, values and relationships. It is within these relationships that our beliefs are formed and tested. Those beliefs are the means in which a person navigates the disorder and chaos observed in the world. This is especially true of unspeakable evil and injustice, out of which the self-sacrificial behavior of the hero may emerge.[4] This type of resilient individual models the necessary self-reflection and moral determination that is needed for the society to regain order and maintain it. For the replication of a peaceful culture to transcend one generation, individuals need to interact with admirable leaders that embody the qualities and values worthy of respect.[5] Leadership needs to be approachable, authentic, honest, and accomplished in the aspects worthy of honor (Galatians 5:22-23, Philippians 4:8).[6] Young people who do not have relationship with individuals that model these characteristics struggle with their self-worth, identity, and are easily confused.[7]

It is at this point that I return to a previous theme of home, in terms of Peterson’s logic of meaning, purpose, and navigating life. Peterson refers to a “place to act,”[8] in which an individual learns the meaning and value of their actions within community. Home is the first social construct that provides the foundational base from which all meaning is derived. A child from birth is acquiring meaning in everything from language, manners, expectations of social interactions, family values, and occupational aspirations. The strength, security, and clarity of the home environment determine the moral priorities through which an individual filters “the methods and theories of science” [9] they encounter. Nearly every day I hear one or more of my Dad’s numerous mini lectures, on what is right, honorable, or wrong. Today, I do not always agree with those lessons, but they are the orientational point [10] from which my analysis begins. 

According to Bouma-Prediger and Walsh, the home is where one learns the ultimate meaning and value of one’s actions.[11] It is our introduction to “the arts…in ritual, drama, literature, and mythology.” [12] The home is the primary source that informs our values, morality, and meaning. If one is fortunate enough to be born into a family of relatively low dysfunctionality, that individual was “shaped” positively by the “consequence(s) of” loving and supportive “social interaction.”[13]

If in fact, the moral fiber of the culture and meaning are woven together in the home, without which there is chaos that spills over into every element of society.[14] Could the current deterioration of the family unit from abuse, the over-valuing of commodities,[15] among other factors, be contributing to the confusion of identity within the family, church, and individuals? 

The final tidbit I gleaned from Peterson was his thoughts on narrative. He claims that narrative, story, or parable, are all the means by which we learn and retain the intrinsic meaning of “objects,” “myths,” that “accurately captures the nature of (life’s) rare experiences.” [16] If the local church is to be God’s expression of home. And home is where learning is assimilated experientially through story,[17] interaction with worthy models, and meaningful rituals. It seems to me, that the local congregations maybe missing this humanities side. There is often a focus on intellectual explanations, while biblical, they are difficult to replicate with sincere conviction that is congruous with individual character.

Have we lost the mystical vision of God? In so doing, have we diminished his omnipotence? Have we damaged our credibility in the larger community, because we have attempted to explain the mystical scientifically?



[1] Jordan B. Peterson, Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief (New York: Routledge, 1999).

[2] Robinson J. Robinson, “The Intellectual We Deserve,” March 14, 2018, 2, https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/03/the-intellectual-we-deserveM.

[3] Peterson, Maps of Meaning, xii.

[4] Ibid, xx.

[5] Ibid, xiii.

[6] Brené Brown, Dare to Lead: Brave Work, Tough Conversations, Whole Hearts (New York: Random House, 2018).

[7] Michele Borba Ed.D., Esteem Builders: A K-8 Self-Esteem Curriculum For Improving Student Achievement, Behavior and School Climate, Second (Torrence, CA: Jalmar Press, 2003).

[8] Peterson, Maps of Meaning, 9.

[9] Ibid., 1.

[10] Steven Bouma-Prediger and Brian J. Walsh, Beyond Homelessness: Christian Faith in a Culture of Displacement (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Pub, 2008).

[11] Ibid.

[12] Peterson, Maps of Meaning, 1.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Ibid, xi.

[15] Jason Paul Clark, “Evangelism and Capitalism: A Reparative Account and Diagnosis of Pathogeneses in the Relationship” (Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary, 2018), https:// digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes/132.

[16] Peterson, Maps of Meaning, 2.

[17] Bouma-Prediger and Walsh, Beyond Homelessness.

Friday, November 11, 2022

“Change money? Change money? Dollar? Marks?”

 “Change money? Change money? Dollar? Marks?” This phrase still haunts me when I am in certain places in Poland. These persistent pleas of individuals with hopes to unload the local currency for a more value stable one.[1] Every Westerner knew these cries, as the hard currency they had could buy their way out of any challenging situation.[2] The long lines of people waiting in line in anticipation of acquiring a long-awaited commodity they do not need, were another standard feature of the highly controlled market system. The long lines due to government control of production caused every item regardless of individual need to have an elevated value. Every product was a means of direct exchange of that item,[3] which was necessary because the money in their pocket no longer retained its value. Meanwhile, those hard currencies were the golden ticket to a more secure future, and imported products, such as Levis, Coke, electronics that could be purchase at the dollar store. These are very real imagines in my mind of a person’s desperate attempt to gain some control over the economic world around them. My longitudinal observations of Polish friends attest to the stifling of the human spirit that “government(s) can cause…by controlling monetary policy.” [4]

The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking,[5] by Saifedean Ammous surprised me with its systematic and historical “discussion of sound money,”[6]while introducing the possibilities of “cryptoeconomics.”[7] Ammous’ clear explanation of the “benefits derived from an economy that grows in a rational and sustainable way.”[8] Dr. Ammous uses his engineering and economic background to lay the foundation for the need of an independent currency that is “without inflation or the negative consequences of the nationalization and politicization of fiduciary money.”[9] He also points out why, in his opinion, the Keynesian economics is deeply flawed.[10] Although, it is the preferred theory of universities and governments, it neglects to consider human behavior while in times of scarcity.[11] Individuals who have options will find a way to overcome the scarcity they encounter if the system does not get in their way. He argues that a free market exchange of goods within a stable monetary system is necessary to produces the futile ground for healthy investments, entrepreneurship, and personal control of one’s financial future.[12] Ammous sees Bitcoin as the cryptocurrency with the greatest potential for being an “international decentralized liquidity network based on sound money principles” [13] that can compete with the centralize banking systems of the nations.

This book definitely gave me a crash course in economics that made sense to me. However, the high risk and uncertainty of Bitcoin have not convinced me to jump into that pond yet. Overall, there are a number of questions this book has stirred in me:

·       Given the high global inflation that many nations are experiencing as a result of Covid 19 measures, economic recovery plans, fuel shortages, and war in Ukraine are we looking at another great depression?

·       Today, I wonder if there is really a hard currency anywhere.

·       Is it really possible to have an independent currency or will the government just step in anyway?

·       Have we been too eager to replace God’s gracious provision that requires faith in the unknown, for a quick fix of a powerful, self-serving government?

·       Is Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies really hack free?

There is a lot to wrestle with in terms of governmental controls in finance and personal independent control. I have seen how extreme government control of economics snuffs the life out of the eyes of individuals. I have watched the same individual gain new life through a free market system with an ever-stabilizing currency become creative entrepreneurs.












Above are pictured the following from left to right: A Polish visa requiring the mandatory exchange of $15/ day. Keep in mind there were no products to purchase with that amount of money. Also, foreigners were not allowed to take any of the excess funds out of the country. The second picture is a coupon for 5 liters of fuel that only foreigners could purchase. The third image is a postage stamp exhibiting the inflated price. After the fall of Communism Poland adjusted the currency by dropping 4 decimal points.



[1] Saifedean Ammous, The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking (Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2018), 57.

[2] Ibid., 5.

[3] Ibid., 1.

[4] Jamil Civitarese, “Saifedean Ammous, the Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Central Banking Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2018,” The Review of Austrian Economics 33, no. 3 (September 2020): 404, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-019-00446-z.

[5] Ammous, The Bitcoin Standard.

[6] Civitarese, “Saifedean Ammous, the Bitcoin Standard,” 403.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Luis Torras, “THE BITCOIN STANDARD: THE DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE TO CENTRAL BANKING by Saifedean Ammous Wiley (2018), 304 Pp. ISBN: 978-1119473862 (Hb, £22.99); 978-1119473862 (e-Book, £17.99),” Economic Affairs 39, no. 1 (February 2019): 160, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12339.

[9] Ammous, The Bitcoin Standard, 160.

[10] Ibid., 53.

[11] Lex Fridman, “Saifedean Ammous: Bitcoin, Anarchy, and Austrian Economics,” youtube.com, n.d., https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?fr=yhs-fc-2212&ei=UTF-8&hsimp=yhs-2212&hspart=fc&param1=7&param2=eJw1i8sKgzAQRX9llgoSJw8Tip%2FRVREXqaYajEZ8YOnXdwItsznn3juD75u6vT84opRKNkW7kJPdCFOFHLkQJB2JUAR%2BTQsj2E0woxmXaTq4SOm5E56WaI4fH4ItK4aQXX7p47XDcgBHhjVQoFUNb61ysOsa3OWekz%2FKShomNWTTeMyhgOAnB4PrpphDN25xdiVHzTAd7PZlN%2F9%2Fcf3w67g0yJT5Ah0NPuA%3D&p=saifedean+ammous&type=fc_A30C76C6185_s58_g_e_d010122_n1009_c24#id=1&vid=5d3c6591ba0495fac7929baaf45bd44f&action=click.

[12] Ammous, The Bitcoin Standard, 52.

[13] Torras, “THE BITCOIN STANDARD,” 161.